<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tntluoma.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tntluoma.com</link>
	<description>Stuff I've Written Down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:43:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidwilsen</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>davidwilsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?page_id=2#comment-2621</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;br&gt;Today I visited your blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://tntluoma.com/tv/directv-and-major-league-baseball-strike-a-great-deal-for-themselves/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tntluoma.com/tv/directv-and-major-league...&lt;/a&gt; and found some interesting information.I want to put a content link in your site which seems perfect match with my website&#039;s content.In return your link will be appear in my site. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope by doing this we can promote each other sites.If you are interested please email me at &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:davidwilsen@gmail.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;davidwilsen@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;David&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />Today I visited your blog <a href="http://tntluoma.com/tv/directv-and-major-league-baseball-strike-a-great-deal-for-themselves/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://tntluoma.com/tv/directv-and-major-league.." rel="nofollow">http://tntluoma.com/tv/directv-and-major-league..</a>. and found some interesting information.I want to put a content link in your site which seems perfect match with my website&#39;s content.In return your link will be appear in my site. <br /><br />Hope by doing this we can promote each other sites.If you are interested please email me at <a href="mailto:davidwilsen@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">davidwilsen@gmail.com</a><br /><br />Regards,<br />David</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graham pearson</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>graham pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?page_id=2#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that domain cost me 20gbp registered and hosted from ukfsn, but it intrigues me that there is a problem.  However not so intriguing as your bookmark for &quot;Calvin 09 - Read The Institutes in a year&quot;.  I tried this several times, last time I got as far as p.78 (I just looked it up).  I&#039;m struggling to understand why anyone tries to read this kind of &quot;writing&quot;.  In 78 pages there wasn&#039;t a usefully meaning sentence, nor even a hint that one was ever intended.  Calvin wanted to say the kind of stuff much better put in a novel, and less usefully aimed at exegetical prose, where he excels in and prefers assumptive tendentiousness to clarity precision thought or concision.  I was reading a 1983 reprint of the Beveridge translation.  It is an historic milestone and probably not much more useful.  I was raised in N. Ireland within a John Knox tradition (Reformed Presbyterian).  Maybe I should try Knox?  But interesting to hear your reasons for Calvin study?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that domain cost me 20gbp registered and hosted from ukfsn, but it intrigues me that there is a problem.  However not so intriguing as your bookmark for &#8220;Calvin 09 - Read The Institutes in a year&#8221;.  I tried this several times, last time I got as far as p.78 (I just looked it up).  I&#8217;m struggling to understand why anyone tries to read this kind of &#8220;writing&#8221;.  In 78 pages there wasn&#8217;t a usefully meaning sentence, nor even a hint that one was ever intended.  Calvin wanted to say the kind of stuff much better put in a novel, and less usefully aimed at exegetical prose, where he excels in and prefers assumptive tendentiousness to clarity precision thought or concision.  I was reading a 1983 reprint of the Beveridge translation.  It is an historic milestone and probably not much more useful.  I was raised in N. Ireland within a John Knox tradition (Reformed Presbyterian).  Maybe I should try Knox?  But interesting to hear your reasons for Calvin study?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
