" /> t 'n t luoma: February 2004 Archives

« January 2004 | Main | March 2004 »

February 29, 2004

5-Sunday-February

February 2004 was an unusual leap year. There were 5 Sundays. I found myself wondering how often this happens, and also wondered what mathematical formula could be used to figure out how often it happened.

My first guess was that it happened every 24 years. My reasoning was that it takes 4 years to have a leap year, and dates are repeated every 6 years — i.e. if March 1 is a Monday in 2004, then it will be again in 2010.

That reasoning, however, turns out to be wrong. Or it is correct, but for only a short period of time.

     March 2004
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
    1  2  3  4  5  6
 7  8  9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

     March 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
    1  2  3  4  5  6
 7  8  9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

     March 2016
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
       1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

     March 2022
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
       1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

As you can see, my little 6-year rule is sometimes true (true for 2004 and 2010, and true for 2016 and 2022, but false for 2010 and 2016, etc).

I quickly gave up and resorted to my copy of ACT! for Palm. I went back and saw that 1976, 1948, and 1920 were also leap-years with 5 Sundays. At that point I concluded that the formula was that we have a 5-Sunday-February every 28 years. (My original guess of 24 years was close, but off my one 4-year period.) That was the end of that.

Except that I kept wondering about it. I kept thinking of exceptions to the “every 4 years is a leap year rule” where I vaguely remembered people arguing about whether or not 2000 a.d. was going to be a leap year, and some software bug that thought 1900 was a leap year when it wasn’t supposed to be.

Being curious to see how far back this would hold, I ran a simple shell script:

#!/bin/sh

touch leapyear.txt

# start at this year
year=2004

# count back to 1850
while [ "$year" -gt "1850" ]; 
do 
# output the calendar for Feb of each year
cal 02 $year >> leapyear.txt

# Subtract 4 (which should give us the previous leap year)
count=`expr $year - 4`
done

So once I was back at my laptop, I set out to research it out more fully. I quickly realized that my “every 28 years is a 5-Sunday-February” was also false — or true with some exceptions.

This simply counted backwards 4 years from 2004 to 1850 and gave me a calendar for February of that year. I simply read the 'leapyear.txt' file and saw that 1976, 1948, 1920, 1880, and 1852 were all 5-Sunday-Februarys (Februaries?). The 28-year rule works — to a point. You’ll notice a 40 year gap between 1880 and 1920. Part of that has to do with the oddity of the leap year system and years which are exactly divisible by 100 but not exactly divisible by 400. (So 1900 a.d. was not a leap year, but 2000 was.)

    February 1900
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
             1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28

Now I was really curious. How many other exceptions where there? How could I check? The simple “look through the file and see” method worked for 100 years (only 25 leap Februarys to examine) but it would be far less useful with a large dataset. For example, if I wanted to find all the 5-Sunday-Februarys from the year 1000 a.d. to 3000 a.d. it would take quite a long time to go through it manually. No, what I needed was a better script. The script should automatically check whether the 29th of Feburary is a Sunday or not. So I wrote another script (actually I just re-wrote the previous one):

#!/bin/sh

# what year do we want to start
year=1000

# what year do we want to end
endyear=3000

# Delete and recreate the output file
# so we have a clean start each time
rm leapyear.txt
touch leapyear.txt

# Enter loop, and continue as long as the year
# we are looking at is less than the year we want to end
while [ "$year" -lt "$endyear" ]; 
do 
# Since this will take some time, we output
# the current year to STDOUT
echo -n "Checking year $year..."

# Now here is the rub.   The 'cal' program outputs
# a calendar (like the ones above)
# So we ask 'cal' to show us the calendar for 
# Febuary (that's the "02") of the "$year"
#
# and we grab the last line (tail -2)
# actually we are grabbing the last 2 lines
# but the last line is blank
#
# Anyway, if that "last line" is equal to "29"
# then we know that the 29th day was a Sunday.
#
# Follow that?
IS5SUNDAY=`cal 02 $year | tail -2`

# if it is a Sunday, then
if [ "$IS5SUNDAY" = "29" ]
then
# say YES to STDOUT
echo "yes"

# and add the year to out output file
echo "$year" >> leapyear.txt
else

# if it is not a Sunday, say NO to STDOUT
echo "no"
fi

# OK, now we increment the year counter by 4
year=`expr $year + 4`

# Note that we are ASSUMING that leap years happen every 4 years
# or not at all.  This is not true for years that end in 1900 
# (see above discussion on division by 100 and 400) but 
# in reality it causes no harm, because although the 
# script will test to see if the 29th of February was 
# a Sunday, the answer will be NO, however, the reason for this
# answer will be because there was no 29th of February.
#
# So we get the "right" answer (no the 29th of Feb was not Sunday)
# for the "wrong reason" (because there was no 29th of Feb)

done

The answer? These are the 5-Sunday-Februarys since the year 1000 a.d.: 1008, 1036, 1064, 1092, 1120, 1148, 1176, 1204, 1232, 1260, 1288, 1316, 1344, 1372, 1400, 1428, 1456, 1484, 1512, 1540, 1568, 1596, 1624, 1652, 1680, 1708, 1736, 1756, 1784, 1824, 1852, 1880, 1920, 1948, 1976, 2004, 2032, 2060, 2088, 2128, 2156. (I stopped at 2156 because by then I will be dead and will presumably cease to care.)

So a 5-Sunday-February has occured only 36 times in the past 1,000 years. (It would be interesting to see if anything significant has happened on those days, any sort of trend that we might find. It was also be interesting to know what the proper plural of “February” is. Is it “Februarys” or “Februaries”?)

In looking for information about this, I came across a very interesting document: Frequently Asked Questions about Calendars, which is much more interesting (or was to me) than it’s name might imply. It also reminded me of one of the things I really enjoy about the web — being able to research something from the comfort of my own living room and coming across well-compiled, well-displayed information. (It was nice to read something different than my usual crowd of technology and other news, web design, etc.)

Among other things, it will explain why the calendar for September, 1752 looks to strange.

 cal 09 1752
   September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 
       1  2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

And if you think that’s bad, then read the Calendar FAQ and notice that in a few places, December 25th (Christmas) came the day after December 14th! Boy, I bet there were a lot of husbands who were stuck trying to explain to their wives why they didn’t have a Christmas present for them. (“But I thought I had another 10 days to shop!!!”)

February 26, 2004

Windows XP 'SE'?

CNet reports that Microsoft is considering an update of Windows XP called "XP Reloaded."

“All of a sudden we realized we had no way to suck more money out of your pockets for a couple of years,” said a made-up Microsoft spokesperson, speaking on condition of not being real. “And all of a sudden there was this look on everyone’s face. So we said, ‘Heck, we might as well try it and see if anyone is dumb enough to pay for it.’ It worked for Windows98.”

The news comes as a surprise to anyone who actually thought Microsoft wait until Longhorn comes out to try and stick it to users’ wallets. Longhorn is estimated to come out in late 2005 or 2006 according to estimates, but no one at Microsoft is apparently dumb enough to make any predictions.

“Two reasons,” said the same imaginary spokesperson, “the first is that none of us are dumb enough to try and set a deadline when we work for a company that consistenly fails to meet them. Second, Bill warned us that if anyone leaked the internal schedule he’d send [Microsoft CEO Steve] Ballmer into our bedrooms late at night.”

Good news for Microsoft is that they hope to release Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac sometime in the calendar year 2004. “Yeah we’re kinda surprised that Apple hasn’t died yet, but as long as we can keep folks to fork over more than $300 for Office, we’re happy to have them as crippled competition.”

When asked how Office 2004 for Mac could have so many cool features not available for Windows, our source replied, “Well, you know, we do have a few creative people here, and we’re sort of at a loss as to what to do with them, so we put them over on the Mac division and that seems to make them happy. Don’t worry, we’ll be sure to introduce some feature in the next release of Office for Windows that will be incompatible with Office for Mac. We’re just not sure what that will be yet.”

February 23, 2004

Apple PowerBook G4 versus the IBM ThinkPad X31

The Apple PowerBook G4 versus the IBM ThinkPad X31.

As I move closer to eventually being a Mac user, you can count on more Mac stuff appearing here :-)

Why are there no dual boot computers?

There are more than 80 operating systems out there (Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, etc) but there are 0 (none, zilch) dual-boot machines (that is, machines which can boot to Windows and one of those other operating systems).

Ever wonder why? Yes or no, you ought to read He Who Controls the Bootloader.

February 17, 2004

Opera 7.5 TP 2 Released

Opera 7.5 TP 2 has been released.

I like it. I like it a lot. Not fully finished yet, but a good improvement.

I've been using it for my mail etc and it seems fairly stable.

That said, I still recommend that you install it to a new directory. There are some cool things to see/experiment with that you will see more easily if you do a clean install.

Remember, it's still a Technology Preview (which is somewhere between Alpha and Beta).

Changelog for 7.5 TP 2

February 15, 2004

50 First Dates

Scale: 7/10
Should you see it? Yes
How's the writing? Fun
Any gaping holes in the plot? Nope
What stands out? Sandler and Barrymore
See it in the theater or wait to rent? Either

If you like Sandler and Barrymore, go see this movie. It's a lot of fun. If you don't, then don't. There's some bathroom humor, but overall it's just a good, fun time.

They have wonderful on-screen chemistry, and they make it work. The only people who won't like this movie are people who don't like either of them, and, quite frankly, why would anyone who don't like either of them go to see the movie?

This is not Punch Drunk Love (which I really enjoyed, but which was a very different Sandler movie).

Not convinced? Read more reviews of 50 First Dates (via MRQE)

February 11, 2004

Web Design and FreeBSD Books For Sale

  • Act! 2000 for Windows for Dummies by Jeffrey Mayer
  • Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability by Steve Krug
  • FreeBSD: An Open-Source Operating System for your Personal Computer
  • Inside Unix
  • Learning GNU Emacs, Second Edition (O'Reilly)
  • Practical Web Traffic Analysis: Standards, Privacy, Techniques, Results
  • Site-Seeing: A Visual Approach to Web Usability by Luke Wroblewski
  • Special Edition Using HTML 4, Fifth Edition
  • Talking Your Talent to the Web by Jeffrey Zeldman
  • The Complete FreeBSD, Second Edition by Greg Lehey
  • The Web Professional’s Handbook
  • Usability for the Web: Designing Web Sites That Work
  • Web Design Workshop by John Tollett, Robin Williams, and David Rohr
  • Web Navigation: Designing the User Experience by Jennifer Fleming

Interested? Email Me. Make an offer.

Microsoft: We are the most secure, because we have fixed the most security holes.

Microsoft UK’s chief security officer (who is apparently trying to get a spot in the management of Dilbert's company) says Internet Explorer is now just about the most secure browser available, says Microsoft - because so many security holes have been filled.

Now, let me ask you this:

Say that you live in a neighborhood with 3 houses.

1 of those houses has been broken into 1574 times.

The other two have been broken into about 10 times, and 8 of those 10 times the first house was also broken into.

Whose house is most secure? Where would you leave your valuables overnight? Would you leave them with the guy who says, “Yeah, I’ve been broken into 574 times before, but now I have figured out all the ways that people can break in, and I have fixed them all.”

Would you trust him?

Or would you think, “Gee, for the past several years people have consistently found new ways to break in, and it seems unlikely that you have found them all... whereas these two groups over here have been pretty steady with regard to security, so I’m going to trust them.”

Oh, and let’s not forget that Microsoft fixed one security hole by removing functionality. This came after they had originally suggested that users should not click on links.

These people are jokes. I wonder if they realize how foolish they seem when they say these things.

February 10, 2004

Mozilla name change (yup, again)

Well, maybe the third time will be the charm for the hapless Mozilla folks. They tried to call their standalone browser Phoenix, then Firebird, and now they’re trying Firefox. Apparently each name has conflicted with another product. Anyone want to wager how long this one will last?

A quick recap of Firefox’s “features” from Mozilla Firefox’s page...

Tabbed-Browsing

Firefox presents a fast and convenient way to browse the web - now you can open several pages in one window in separate browser tabs. Open links in the background while you read a web page, then continue to the links when you're done - pages are available when you need them, making the web feel faster even over slow connections.

Opera can do that. Actually, Opera can do better than that (learn more about Opera’s MDI feature, which Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox doesn’t offer.)

Popup Blocking

Popup advertising is one of the most annoying things to hit the web in recent years. Firefox shields you from unwanted popup advertising. It also gives you control to allow certain sites to open popup windows, if required to operate.

Yup, Opera can block unwanted popups as well. It doesn’t yet support site-specific settings, but I have found the general settings to work for 99% of the sites out there.

Integrated Search

Firefox makes finding things easy. The built in Google bar provides convenient access to the best search engine on the web. Simply click in the Google bar or press Ctrl+K, type some words and press Enter.

Opera has Google built-in, and about 14 others as well. Plus you can easily add your own. And you can decide which one to search by using single keys, i.e. g = google, z = Amazon.com, etc (Learn more about Opera’s search.ini).

Efficient Navigation

Details are important to us. Sometimes it really is easier to navigate with the keyboard. Firefox lets you open links by simply typing some of the text in the link - no mouse necessary.

Opera welcomes Firefox as the second browser to realize that details are important. You can navigate Opera by Q and A keys, or Shift + Arrow Keys. Or you can search text or links on the page. Or you can get a list of all the links on a page and use the arrow keys to pick which one you want.

AutoDownload

Automatically download files to your Desktop or another location with the new AutoDownload feature. Downloading becomes much simpler without windows popping up asking you where to save, etc.

Opera offers a Quick Download feature which will download without asking you where to save. In case you do happen to care where files are saved, Opera will also pop up a window asking you where to save a file, but (unlike IE and Firefox) Opera will start the download as soon as you request it, and continue to download the file while you decide where you want to save it. (IE and Firefox wait until you have chosen a name/location before the download begins.)

February 09, 2004

Technology Purchases in 2003

(Not Opera-related)

I was thinking back on the technology booms of 2003. Yeah, I know everyone else did their reflecting on 2003 a month ago, but I’m doing mine now.

Treo300600

The first (chronologically) was the Treo300, which replaced my aged Palm IIIxe and my no so aged cell phone. I lost said cell phone somewhere between Atlanta and Gainesville airports.

The Treo300 was a fairly decent phone plus PDA. It had a keyboard rather than relying on writing with the stylus. Since I usually carried both my Palm and my cell, it was convenient to have them both together, if for no other reason than it was one less set of batteries to worry about being charged.

The other important feature was that it was web enabled, meaning that I could get/send email (SnapperMail Rocks). This feature alone was relatively powerful.

But the Treo300 suffered from being the first generation of PDA/cell phone combination units. It had the unique ability of being both bulky (wide left to right) and flimsy (thin front to back). One time someone saw me talking on it and said that it looked like the oldest cell phone she had ever seen (because of the width, I’m sure... and you can’t see that it is also a PDA from across the room).

Due to the flimsy-ness, within a few months I had worn out the keyboard. Given the amount of usage it got, that should be no surprise, but it was not a good sign of its long-term viability. I spent a good deal of time one day at the Sprint store trying to get a replacement unit. To make a really, really, really long story short, eventually they let me upgrade to a Treo600 (which was good, because what was to prevent the replacement Treo300 from getting worn out in an equally short time?)

I really like the Treo600 better. The Treo300 was a flip phone, which meant that the screen had a built in protector, but it added to the bulk, of course. The Treo600 has better range and roaming, it is much more sturdy, and narrower. The narrowness is also a drawback, in that the keys are rather hard to type with any speed and accuracy. But let’s face it, no one is taking class notes with this thing, it is mostly for quick emails (dialing the phone can be done on the touch screen, which I can do with my finger).

iPod

Tracey bought me an iPod for Father’s Day, and I have really loved it. For long car rides, it has been a godsend. It is so much better than my CD collection, because I can take it with me anywhere and have a lot of options available, rather than just a few CDs at a time.

Slashdot had an article about the iPod as a “gateway drug” that gets people hooked on Mac. It definitely has done that for me. When the current laptop goes, I’ll definitely replace it with an iBook or Powerbook.

iPod Accessories: iTrip (wireless FM transmitter which lets me go from the car to my home/office stereo without plugging anything in), Contour Showcase (to protect the little darling my my inevitable mishandling), Belkin Auto Charger w/Audio for iPod (which serves as an in-car charger and a cassette adapter). Am currently in the market for a voice recorder, looking at iTalk or Belkin’s iPod Voice Recorder Belkin’s is shipping now, but the iTalk looks like the better product.)

DirecTIVO

Getting DirecTV was not a good experience (it took months to get the installation complete, and they lied about when local channels would be available), but getting DirecTIVO was great. Tivo is wonderful, I haven’t watched anything I haven’t wanted to since we got it (you know when you get home and just want to watch something but there is nothing on, so you watch whatever is on). I especially haven’t missed commercials.

So many folks have written about how great Tivo is, I hardly need go on about it here, but suffice it to say that I concur.

Chevy Impala

Ok, cars aren’t exactly new technology, but the Impala is definitely the best car I’ve ever owned, and one of the best I’ve ever driven. The car also came with OnStar, which is fairly cool, but far too expensive. The “safe and sound” package was like $200/year, and the driving directions was approximately $400/year. (They no longer list annual prices on the website). The phone costs are way too high also (see OnStar Calling Plans. 30¢ per minute? You can make international calls for a fraction of that.

The feature that I have enjoyed the most is definitely the heated seats. Heated seats! What luxury! Anyone who has lived in a colder climate knows how long it takes a car sitting out in the cold to get warmed up. The seats start to heat up immediately.

Another feature I use daily is the HomeLink, which is a button which controls the garage door. Sure you could use the remote that came with it, but this is cooler. Speaking of technology, a remote-controlled garage door is fairly cool and easily taken for granted, but in rain and snow, very helpful. Without it our garage would probably not get used very often except to store stuff, which is a poor use for a garage if you live anywhere that gets snow (or rain, for that matter).

DirecPC/DirecWay (bad bad bad)

The only bad technology experience that I can remember from 2003 was satellite internet. Downloading large files may be fast on satellite, but web surfing in general is not. FTP and SSH are also incredibly slow, and I use those nearly daily too.

How bad was it? Well, first they lied about being able to use it with my Wireless Ethernet equipment, and then the speeds were so bad that I sent it back within the first 30 days in exchange for 28.8 dialup (that’s right, not 56k or 53k, but 28.8... on a good day).

Which is the best?

Tivo, Treo600, iPod, heated seats, garage door openers... which is the best? I don't know. I wouldn’t want to go without any of them.

Ethan Wallpaper

[thumbnail of Ethan] Hi my name is Ethan, I’m adorable, and you can download this picture for Desktop wallpaper in any of the following sizes:

Opera Press Release RSS Feed

Ok I may be the last one to know this, but Opera has a press release RSS feed.

(Whether or not RSS can be considered Real Simple is a debatable question for another day.)

Trust Your Vet

A woman brought a very limp duck into a veterinary surgery . As she lay her pet on the table, the vet pulled out his stethoscope and listened to the bird’s chest. After a moment or two, the vet shook his head sadly and said, “I’m so sorry, Cuddles has passed away.”

The distressed owner wailed, “Are you sure?” “Yes, I am sure The duck is dead,” he replied. “How can you be so sure,” she protested. “I mean, you haven’t done any testing on him or anything. He might just be in a coma or something.”

The vet rolled his eyes, turned around and left the room, and returned a few moments later with a black Labrador Retriever. As the duck’s owner looked on in amazement, the dog stood on his hind legs, put his front paws on the examination table and sniffed the duck from top to bottom. He then looked at the vet with sad eyes and shook his head.

The vet patted the dog and took it out, and returned a few moments later with a beautiful cat. The cat jumped up on the table and also sniffed delicately at the bird. The cat sat back on its haunches, shook its head, meowed softly and strolled out of the room. The vet looked at the woman and said, “I’m sorry, but as I said, this is most definitely, 100% certifiably, a dead duck.”

Then the vet turned to his computer terminal, hit a few keys and produced a bill which he handed to the woman. The duck’s owner, still in shock, took the bill. “$150!”, she cried, “$150 just to tell me my duck is dead?!!”

The vet shrugged. “I’m sorry. If you’d taken my word for it, the bill would have been $20, but with the Lab Report and the Cat Scan, it went up considerably!”

February 04, 2004

OmniWeb 5 Beta

I bet I used OmniWeb before you did.

Ok, well there’s a fair chance that very few of you have ever used OmniWeb, because it is only (now) for the Mac. But I used it way back when, back in the dark ages of NeXTSTEP and OPENSTEP.

“Big deal” you say?

Well you try writing a browser for an operating system tied to hardware that only runs as 25Mhz (or at the most 33 Mhz... we called those “Turbo” machines.

OmniWeb had a great UI and did things like checked your bookmarks to see if they still existed. It had its problems, but Omni made a browser for an OS that no one else cared about — that was true for Mac OS-X Server when it first came out too.

The problem lately has been that OmniWeb was so far behind with regard to standards that few people used it. OmniWeb5 is addressing some of those problems (though it will still be behind Safari).

I love Opera on Windows, but if I were on a Mac, I’d be using OmniWeb5.

Read more:

Official OmniWeb5 page at OmniGroup.com

First Look: OmniWeb 5 Beta (by Michael Brewer @ MacDevCenter)

OmniWeb 5 Public Beta (by John Gruber @ DaringFireball)

February 03, 2004

Perils of Sermon Preparation

“Do not waste your passion on inanimate objects.”

I no longer remember from whence that advice came to me; it may have been advice I gave myself (“Thank you” “No, thank you” “You first,” “No, I insist”). Regardless of its origin, I am violating the rule today. I’m sitting here with my Greek/English Interlinear [Tyndale], Sakae Kubo's Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, and Bauer/Gingrich (A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature) I sit here a) wishing I was a better Greek student and b) thoroughly annoyed at the NRSV.

Why annoyed? Well let me lead you through it. One of the lectionary readings for this coming Sunday is 1 Corinthians 15:1-11. Here is how the NRSV translates the first two verses:

(1) Now I would remind you, brothers and sisters, of the good news that I proclaimed to you, which you in turn received, in which also you stand, (2) through which also you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the message that I proclaimed to you-unless you have come to believe in vain. [NRSV Translation of 1 Corinthians 15:1-2]

I had this whole thing working in my head about the “being saved.” Verb tense is important here, right? It is an -ing verb, indicating ongoing action, present tense. Salvation was achieved through the cross and resurrection, but the effects of that salvation are still taking shape in us and in our lives today. It sounded like the beginning of a sermon to me.

Except that the NRSV translation is wrong.

Last night before bed, I picked up my copy of Eugene Peterson’s The Message and read the same verses:

(1) Friends, let me go over the Message with you one final time - this Message that I proclaimed and that you made your own; this Message on which you took your stand (2) and by which your life has been saved. (I'm assuming, now, that your belief was the real thing and not a passing fancy, that you're in this for good and holding fast.) [The Message Translation of 1 Corinthians 15:1-2]

Hrm. Has been saved. I asked Tracey to read the passage out of the NIV she was reading:

(1) Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. (2) By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. [NIV Translation of 1 Corinthians 15:1-2]

Hrm. Are saved. (Tim sees his sermon idea circling the bowl....)

So it seemed that the mighty NRSV might have gotten this one wrong. I’d have to find out for myself. (Whether this is why I could not sleep or not, I can’t say... but my Greek books were in my study at the church, and as much as I wanted to, I was not driving downtown at 11 p.m. to find out. These are the days I wish we lived in a manse.)

My Greek Interlinear has the NASB under the Greek text, (Actually, I always thought it was the NASB but I realize now that I was wrong, it is close to the NASB but not the same.) and the NRSV along the side. This really ought to be my main Bible, but since it lacks the Old Testament, it is rather impractical.

I saw a much more compact version of the Interlinear at Cokesbury if anyone is looking to get me a birthday present. Actually what I would really like is a good software program that has the NRSV, the Greek and Hebrew [with study aids for those of us who were never very good with the original languages], the NIV, NASB, and NIV. However, there is no single package that sells all of that together, so you end up working in several different packages at once, which loses much of the point. Even better would be something that would tie to my Palm, and you do not have the luxury of unlimited space there, so it would require a single, efficient package.

[image of Greek word] The not-NASB-but-close “literal translation” renders the word as “you are saved”

I came across a very helpful site with a searchable New Testament in Greek which highlighted the word in context and gave me this information:

Major1:verb
Person:2nd
Tense:present
Voice:passive
Mood:indicative
Number:plural

Ok, so it’s present tense (you are saved) not past tense (you were saved) or perfect tense (you are being saved). So why does the NRSV render it as “being saved” which is the completely wrong tense? In the introductory comments to the NRSV by Bruce M. Metzger, he said that the translating committee sought to follow the maxim, “As literal as possible, as free as necessary.” Now these folks are all smarter than I am, and certainly several orders of magnitude beyond me when it comes to matters related to the translating of the Greek text into English. I am aware that “doing” is difficult and “criticizing” is easy, but this seems to be just a mistake in translation as far as I can see.

There are those who caution against this kind of work that I am doing, this work of pastors delving too deeply and too precisely into the original languages. Why? Because it undercuts the credibility of English translations, which is what most church-folk rely on. If you keep cutting out pieces, they are left with a hole-y Bible (instead of the other kind ;-) I am also reminded of a professor who warned a group of seminarians against preaching Greek from the pulpit. Makes sense, as it can easily be used to make oneself appear superior to the congregation. (No worries about that with my Greek skills, however... in fact some would probably caution against letting amatuers like myself at the original text at all... a little knowledge being a dangerous thing, and all that...)

In some ways this makes it easier, because we don’t have to worry about someone arguing that salvation wasn’t complete on Easter and pointing to this reference to defend their case. (Well, we might have to worry about that if they are just using the NRSV in a group of people who are just using the NRSV but I doubt many such groups exist.)

Well, back to The Book.

February 02, 2004

Tobacco Companies

Other than the Patriots winning (twice in my lifetime? Who'd have thought...) one of the best things about the Superbowl was this ad (whic doesn't have to do with the groin/bodily functions)

Shards O' Glass

It blasts the tobacco companies for their sickening commercials which say, "Gee, we just found out this might be bad for you. We care about you. Really."

Cold Mountain

Scale: 4/10
Should you see it? Not unless you are feeling too happy
How's the writing? Mediocre
Any gaping holes in the plot? No
What stands out? It's slow, depressing, and predictable
See it in the theater or wait to rent? Neither

I said recently that I don’t like to know much about a movie before I see it. Perhaps this was another good example of why. I knew that this was supposed to be an excellent movie, and maybe my expectations were too high.

Here is an outline of the movie (don’t keep reading if you don’t want to know some of what happens at the end).

1) Girl meets boy. She’s high class, he’s a working man. They have stilted conversation.

2) Civil War breaks out (announced by North Carolina boys celebrating “We got our war” and firing guns into the sky.

3) Stereotypical Bad Guy (who has been clearly identified since the beginning) steps forward. He and his sons won’t be fighting in the war, they’ll stay at home (cue omnious music here).

4) Men go off to war. Boy kisses Girl just as they are leaving for war.

5) War turns out to be bloody and violent. (Subtle message: War is bad, and not fun like the foolish mountain men of North Caroline were expecting it would be.) Back home, things are bad. Stereotypical Bad Guy and his sons are taking advantage of the women. Crops are not growing. Girl’s father who has a “weak chest” dies. She lets their negros free, and can’t tend to the farm herself, but is too prideful to accept help from others.

6) Boy is shot. Unlike minor characters who are shot/injured, he lives. He recovers and decides to desert and head back home. Cut away to “back home” and Stereotypical Bad Guy and his sons announce that anyone who deserts the army or anyone who harbors a deserter will be guilty of treason. Cue omninous/foreshadowing music.

7) Girl meets tough-as-nails girl who helps her get the farm back together. Says she expects to eat for payment and we are expected to ignore that girl didn’t have enough food for herself, nevermind someone else. Girl sells piano for food, becomes more like tough-as-nails girl.

8) Boy tries to get home, gets caught, gets free, tries to find shelter, runs into lonely widow (with freakishly strange looking baby), runs into evil Yankee soldiers, keeps heading home.

9) Back home, Other Family has their sons come back, they get caught and father and sons are killed by Stereotypical Bad Guy (who also wants to get Girl into bed.) Tough-As-Nails Girl has father issues. Father returns. (Cue foreshadowing “I bet everything will be OK between them in the end” music.)

10) Stereotypical Bad Guy finds Tough-As-Nails Girl’s Father (who got caught because he didn’t listen to Tough-As-Nails Girl). He and his companion get shot (reminder: Tough-As-Nails Girl’s Father is not minor character, therefore he will live).

11) Girl and Tough-As-Nails Girl find her Father (shot but not dead) and help him recover.

12) Girl goes out and finds Boy. Girl and Boy are reunited. Girl and Boy decide that a wedding is useless, all they need to do is make a promise to each other and that will be good enough. Girl and Boy do what comes next. Girl tells Tough-As-Nails Girl that she had seen Boy in a vision but it looked like he was falling, like she was losing him. Cue dramatic foreshadowing can-you-guess-how-this-will-end music.

13) Next day Stereotypical Bad Guy and his sons find them. Tough-As-Nails Girl is shot (she looks dead, but will later appear just fine.) Boy is hero, and so he shoots them all, but just when you think everything is OK you realize he is shot, and since it is now the end of the movie and — after all, we warned you — Boy staggers just like Girl saw before in her vision and yes, he is dead (about the only good part of the movie).

14) Girl and Tough-As-Nails Girl go on to live happily ever after. Girl has Boy’s baby from that one night of passion and teaches her in the ways of the farming world. Tough-As-Nails Girl and her father have reunited. Tough-As-Nails Girl now wears sundress and has a child of her own (moral of the story: she just needed a man to bring out her feminine side).

I’m sure this was a much better book than the movie, which was little more than many things we’ve seen before. It reminded me of Titanic, which was nothing more than a B-class “love story” that happened to be on the Titanic. Hrm... the only good part of that movie was that the male love interest dies at the end too.

I will not be surprised if this movie wins a lot of awards. Hollywood likes a movie where: war is shown to be bad, lots of men are shown to be evil, men who take advantage of women are shot and killed, and at the end the woman beds her man so she gets a child (a girl) before he is killed by another evil man while defending her.