<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Opera9 what Firefox 2 should be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/</link>
	<description>Stuff I've Written Down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sucka4Opra</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>sucka4Opra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I&#039;ve been using Opera since version 3 and loving it!&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; As an interaction engineer I&#039;m still amazed about the usability of this browser.  The wand for instance, one control-enter and you&#039;re logged in to your favourite site. Do you have more logins? arrow-down, enter. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; The best: OPERA LETS YOU KNOW WHAT IT&#039;S DOING! There&#039;s a real status-bar, not just a blue rectangle moving from left to right to left to right to left, meanwhile showing a white, empty browserwindow like MS IE. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Firefox, in my opinion, is pretty cool as well. When developing a webapplication i always use Firefox because there&#039;s this fantastic webdeveloper extension, which lets you edit styles and more on the fly and has loads of debugging tools. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;  Some of my customers actually care how their site renders in Firefox. I&#039;ve never heard anyone complain about a page not rendering properly in Opera, other than myself that is.  The use of Firefox, some say, went up to more then 10%. This surely will make a lot of idiots think twice before clicking crap in FrontPage. More standards compliant sites will be good for Opera.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I think everyone who ever tried Opera for their browsing for a long enough amount of time (let&#039;s say o month) will NEVER go back. I&#039;ll put my money on that. Plus I heard Opera&#039;s gonna have extensions support as well! &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; To sum up my story with a previous post:  &lt;b&gt;Yay for Opera!!!&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I&#8217;ve been using Opera since version 3 and loving it!</em> </p>

<p> As an interaction engineer I&#8217;m still amazed about the usability of this browser.  The wand for instance, one control-enter and you&#8217;re logged in to your favourite site. Do you have more logins? arrow-down, enter. </p>

<p> The best: OPERA LETS YOU KNOW WHAT IT&#8217;S DOING! There&#8217;s a real status-bar, not just a blue rectangle moving from left to right to left to right to left, meanwhile showing a white, empty browserwindow like MS IE. </p>

<p> Firefox, in my opinion, is pretty cool as well. When developing a webapplication i always use Firefox because there&#8217;s this fantastic webdeveloper extension, which lets you edit styles and more on the fly and has loads of debugging tools. </p>

<p>  Some of my customers actually care how their site renders in Firefox. I&#8217;ve never heard anyone complain about a page not rendering properly in Opera, other than myself that is.  The use of Firefox, some say, went up to more then 10%. This surely will make a lot of idiots think twice before clicking crap in FrontPage. More standards compliant sites will be good for Opera.  </p>

<p></p><p> I think everyone who ever tried Opera for their browsing for a long enough amount of time (let&#8217;s say o month) will NEVER go back. I&#8217;ll put my money on that. Plus I heard Opera&#8217;s gonna have extensions support as well! </p> <p> To sum up my story with a previous post:  <b>Yay for Opera!!!</b> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-540</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Argie, there are lot of adblockers you can use with opera... I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.operaadfilter.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.operaadfilter.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.operaadfilter.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; very much, just try it out...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argie, there are lot of adblockers you can use with opera&#8230; I like <a href="http://www.operaadfilter.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.operaadfilter.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.operaadfilter.com/</a> very much, just try it out&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-539</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Argie,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;hey man come on, Opera has at least a few features over FF.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First of all, you say most users don&#039;t want to manually edit .ini files.  That&#039;s true, but most users (the bulk of which still use IE) don&#039;t want to go download 10 extensions to get a nice feature rich browser.  I am technically saavy, and one of my favorite features is that I don&#039;t need to extend Opera for my favorite features.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Second of all, I really feel the MDI in Opera is more intuitive than tabs in Firefox.  Here&#039;s a situation where you have to edit a (basically) text file to change some of FF&#039;s tabbing, but Opera gives menus to edit MDI prefs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mind you, I dig FF too, but I just dig Opera more (a lot more).  And, I have to be careful of comparison (as does anyone), because who knows what extensions are out there right now.   But, I feel my first point covers that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, one last thing.  And, this one&#039;s a biggie.  Here&#039;s a wonderful feature of FF that I cannot completely figure out in Opera.  You can (very easliy) set FF to clear ALL personal data on exit.  This is an awesome feature, and probably a selling point for some.  I wish we had that in Opera.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argie,</p>

<p>hey man come on, Opera has at least a few features over FF.</p>

<p>First of all, you say most users don&#8217;t want to manually edit .ini files.  That&#8217;s true, but most users (the bulk of which still use IE) don&#8217;t want to go download 10 extensions to get a nice feature rich browser.  I am technically saavy, and one of my favorite features is that I don&#8217;t need to extend Opera for my favorite features.</p>

<p>Second of all, I really feel the MDI in Opera is more intuitive than tabs in Firefox.  Here&#8217;s a situation where you have to edit a (basically) text file to change some of FF&#8217;s tabbing, but Opera gives menus to edit MDI prefs.</p>

<p>Mind you, I dig FF too, but I just dig Opera more (a lot more).  And, I have to be careful of comparison (as does anyone), because who knows what extensions are out there right now.   But, I feel my first point covers that.</p>

<p>Oh, one last thing.  And, this one&#8217;s a biggie.  Here&#8217;s a wonderful feature of FF that I cannot completely figure out in Opera.  You can (very easliy) set FF to clear ALL personal data on exit.  This is an awesome feature, and probably a selling point for some.  I wish we had that in Opera.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argie01</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>argie01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m using Opera from version 4.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I think you can compare specific FF plugins and Opera.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The FF plugins add much more functionality than Opera will never have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Until now, Opera can&#039;t do something so simple as adblock extension. Of course, I can edit filter.ini and so on. But do you really think the users gonna edit filter.ini every time they want filter and adv ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;C&#039;mon man... :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Opera&#039;s speed is the best and almost the only feature to use it instead to use FF.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;regards,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Argie&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Opera from version 4.</p>

<p>But I think you can compare specific FF plugins and Opera.</p>

<p>The FF plugins add much more functionality than Opera will never have.</p>

<p>Until now, Opera can&#8217;t do something so simple as adblock extension. Of course, I can edit filter.ini and so on. But do you really think the users gonna edit filter.ini every time they want filter and adv ?</p>

<p>C&#8217;mon man&#8230; :)</p>

<p>The Opera&#8217;s speed is the best and almost the only feature to use it instead to use FF.</p>

<p>regards,</p>

<p>Argie</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axe</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Axe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-537</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It still doesn&#039;t support writely&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still doesn&#8217;t support writely</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Blade</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 02:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-536</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;O9 does have per-site preferences, just read the changelog. :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s no GUI for editing it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IE7 will still be missing tons and tons of stuff that Firefox and Opera have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A lot of enhancements in the current TP involve scripting and stuff. I was able to make a couple of my userjs scripts run MUCH MUCH more efficiently with the new things.  I hope that future TPs will give us more new stuff on the inside and on the outside. :D&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hear the IMAP stuff is pretty good for those it works for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;O9 is better at ACID2 than Firefox is :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O9 does have per-site preferences, just read the changelog. :-)</p>

<p>There&#8217;s no GUI for editing it.</p>

<p>IE7 will still be missing tons and tons of stuff that Firefox and Opera have.</p>

<p>A lot of enhancements in the current TP involve scripting and stuff. I was able to make a couple of my userjs scripts run MUCH MUCH more efficiently with the new things.  I hope that future TPs will give us more new stuff on the inside and on the outside. :D</p>

<p>I hear the IMAP stuff is pretty good for those it works for.</p>

<p>O9 is better at ACID2 than Firefox is :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arve</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Arve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-535</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Err. There &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; site-specific preferences in Opera 9 TP1. There&#039;s just no GUI yet. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.opera.com/haavard/blog/show.dml/47671&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Haavard&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; post&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err. There <em>are</em> site-specific preferences in Opera 9 TP1. There&#8217;s just no GUI yet. See <a href="http://my.opera.com/haavard/blog/show.dml/47671" rel="nofollow">Haavard&#8217;s</a> post</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/links/is-opera9-what-firefox-2-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=79#comment-534</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s hope that with IE7 being (almost) standards compliant that we&#039;ll get decent coding from webmasters--since it will break in IE7 too, which is what the naive webmasters use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yay for Opera 9!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope that with IE7 being (almost) standards compliant that we&#8217;ll get decent coding from webmasters&#8212;since it will break in IE7 too, which is what the naive webmasters use.</p>

<p>Yay for Opera 9!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

