Anti-Atkins group (PCRM) is a PETA front

December 6, 2003

ConsumerFreedom reports that that the AMA has censured the so-called “Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine” (PCRM). Important points include:

  • “This misnamed ‘physicians committee’ represents a tiny fraction of America’s doctors who place animal-rights ideology above their patients’ health
  • PCRM has asserted itself as a home for anti-meat, pro-vegan nutritionists who are committed to removing beef, dairy, poultry, and other animal products from the American diet for good.
  • The established medical community has soundly rejected PCRM’s dietary advice in the past.
  • The American Medical Association has written that it finds the recommendations of PCRM irresponsible and potentially dangerous to the health and welfare of Americans.
  • In a separate public censure, the AMA marveled at how effectively a fringe organization of questionable repute continues to hoodwink the media with a series of questionable research that fails to enhance public health.
  • PCRM has long-standing ties with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which has funneled over $850,000 to its medical front group.
  • Most Americans are too smart to knowingly take dietary advice from PETA. But when animal rights activists put on the sheep’s clothing of the medical profession, it becomes harder to know who’s credible. Force-feeding animal rights propaganda to Americans doesn’t sound very ‘responsible’ to me.

Personally I’m amazed at the FUD that surrounds the entire low-carb way of eating, but to have it cloaked behind a political agenda (and PETA is nothing but a political action committee) at the utter disregard of people’s health is disgusting.

Fortunately my doctor was well-informed about it. After having been on Atkins since the end of August I went from this picture in May to this picture in mid-October.

Note: Yes I know that the Consumer Freedom group also has an agenda, but I wasn’t suggesting anyone take their advice either. My reference to them had was simply because they were the source material for the AMA’s censure. The American Council on Science and Health has also had concerns about the mis-representation of the PCRM and also had questions about low carb as well.

Of course the ACSH also refuses to believe that a calorie is not a calorie as was shown in a recent study. Dr. Atkins and others said this for a long time and were consistenly scoffed at. They all complained that Atkins hadn’t done enough scientific research. Now there is a study that showed exactly what he said. It will be fun to see how folks respond.

Update (2004-02-11): PCRM illegally obtained Dr. Atkins medical records and falsely accused him of being obese at the time of his death. Read The Truth about Dr. Atkins’ Weight…. Not that his weight has anything to do with the validity of his claims about low carb eating, which have been demonstrated for 30+ years ….

  • bill

    The AMA released this statement on 2/10:
    "In the early 1990s, AMA spokespersons made critical comments pertaining to the dietary recommendations issued by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM). These statements regarding diet are no longer current, as the AMA does not have policy specifically addressing vegetarian diets or the inclusion of milk in a diet. The AMA recognizes that a great deal of scientific evidence has been accumulated on nutritional issues over the past decade and supports continued research into the overall relationship between diet and health."

  • TjL

    NOTE: The full text of the statement can be found at http://www.pcrm.org/news/statement040218.html


    The statement only says that they are no longer saying that vegetarian diets are bad for you.


    In fact, what the AMA is saying sounds like they aren't saying anything for or against vegetarianism.


    That does not change the fact that their major contributors are from PETA, nor does it change the fact that they are fundamentally opposed to the eating of meat or any animal products, and that political opinion should be weighed when considering their arguments.


    The release does not change any of the above information about what the AMA may think of the PCRM as an entity. All it says is that their diet may not be fundamentally unhealthy.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Mostly Working Now

Next post: MemTurbo still sending spam