<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Removable Media Context Menus in Windows XP vs Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tntluoma.com/technology/removable-media-context-menus-in-windows-xp-vs-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tntluoma.com/technology/removable-media-context-menus-in-windows-xp-vs-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>Stuff I've Written Down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mneptok</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/technology/removable-media-context-menus-in-windows-xp-vs-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>mneptok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=550#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Removing media without ejecting it is very dangerous. Ejecting means the host OS (be it Windows, OSX, or a Linux) completes any read/write routines and cleanly dismounts the drive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just yanking the thing out risks doing so in the middle of a filesystem operation, which quite possible could corrupt the filesystem on that piece of media.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Eject&quot; exists in Windows, OSX, and Linux for a reason. Use it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing media without ejecting it is very dangerous. Ejecting means the host OS (be it Windows, OSX, or a Linux) completes any read/write routines and cleanly dismounts the drive.</p>

<p>Just yanking the thing out risks doing so in the middle of a filesystem operation, which quite possible could corrupt the filesystem on that piece of media.</p>

<p>&#8220;Eject&#8221; exists in Windows, OSX, and Linux for a reason. Use it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. King</title>
		<link>http://tntluoma.com/technology/removable-media-context-menus-in-windows-xp-vs-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>J. King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tntluoma.com/?p=550#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I confess I&#039;m a little confused, Tim; I -never- eject media via software; I just unplug it, pull it out, etc.  For me both features are entirely useless.  Hell, everything except &quot;Properties&quot; (and &quot;Open Command Window Here&quot;, on occasion) is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Though I have remarked to myself on more than one occasion that having &quot;Format&quot; and &quot;Eject&quot; right by each other (and within the same sub-section, no less!) is extremely poor design, I suspect it&#039;s not an issue for many people.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(TjL writes: Windows XP and OS X will complain if a disk is removed without being unmounted properly.  At least in my experience.  Is this not true for everyone?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess I&#8217;m a little confused, Tim; I -never- eject media via software; I just unplug it, pull it out, etc.  For me both features are entirely useless.  Hell, everything except &#8220;Properties&#8221; (and &#8220;Open Command Window Here&#8221;, on occasion) is.</p>

<p>Though I have remarked to myself on more than one occasion that having &#8220;Format&#8221; and &#8220;Eject&#8221; right by each other (and within the same sub-section, no less!) is extremely poor design, I suspect it&#8217;s not an issue for many people.</p>

<p>(TjL writes: Windows XP and OS X will complain if a disk is removed without being unmounted properly.  At least in my experience.  Is this not true for everyone?)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

